Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration with or without Palatal Injection for Posterior Maxillary Teeth Extraction - A Split-Mouth Randomized Trial

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of posterior maxillary teeth extraction buccal infiltration with or without the use of palatal injection. Material and Methods: A total of 70 patients underwent extraction of bilateral maxillary posterior teeth under 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with 1:2,00000 adrenaline infiltration in this single-centric split-mouth randomized trial. The test side was administered with a buccal infiltration of 2 mL of anesthetic alone. An extended waiting period of 10 minutes was given before the commencement of the procedure. A standard protocol was followed for the control side. A single operator performed all extractions. Results: A total of 140 posterior maxillary teeth were extracted. Patients marked pain perception on a visual analogue scale in three different instances. During the administration of injections for the test side, the pain score was less than that of the control side and was statistically significant. The overall pain during the extraction procedure was comparable and statistically insignificant. The overall success of the method was 90%. Conclusion: Extraction of posterior maxillary teeth was feasible with a single buccal infiltration without palatal injection in most cases using an extended waiting period. Dentists can attempt extraction without palatal injections with optimal success. However, the alternate technique could be used when there is a necessity for rescue palatal anesthesia.

Sensibilidad aumentada a lidocaína: estudio genético de un caso / Increased sensitivity to lidocaine: Genetic study of a case

Systemic toxicity by local anesthetics (LAs) is a severe and feared complication in anesthetic practice that generally results from the administration of an inappropriately high dose of LAs or an injection at an inappropriate place, either intravascular or a site with high absorption[1]. However, it is known that the susceptibility to these drugs may vary within the population, which may occur due to genetic changes in the LA binding site, located in the potential-dependent Na+ channels (Nav), thus increasing or decreasing its affinity and, therefore, its clinical consequences. We present a case of a 61 years-old female patient with a medical history of increased sensitivity to LAs. In this scenario, a genetic study was performed to exclude a Nav channel dysfunction.

La toxicidad sistémica por anestésicos locales (ALs) es una grave y temida complicación en la práctica anestésica que generalmente resulta de la administración de una dosis inapropiadamente alta de ALs o a una inyección en un lugar inadecuado, llámese intravascular o un sitio al alta absorción[1]. A pesar de lo anterior, es conocido que la susceptibilidad al efecto de estos fármacos puede variar dentro de la población, lo cual puede ocurrir debido a cambios genéticos en el sitio de unión de los AL, localizado en los canales de Na+ dependientes de potencial (Nav), incrementando o disminuyendo así su afinidad y, por ende, sus consecuencias clínicas. Presentamos el caso de una paciente de 61 años con historia de sensibilidad aumentada a Als. En este escenario, se le ofreció un estudio genético para excluir una disfunción específica a nivel de canal Nav

A case of epileptic seizure due to lidocaine local anesthesia

Lidocaine is an amide-structured local anesthetic commonly used in practice in anesthesiology. Because of its rapid onset, it is frequently used in topical and infiltration anesthesia, regional blocks, regional intravenous anesthesia (RIVA) and general anesthesia to suppress hemodynamic responses to intubation, as well as some cardiac arrhythmias and epileptic seizures. Here, we present a case with seizures and impaired consciousness following iv lidocaine treatment during sedoanalgesia without a history of epilepsy. A thirty-seven-year-old female patient, who was scheduled for a cervical biopsy operation in the Gynecology and Obstetrics clinic, developed a loss of consciousness due to lidocaine with tonic-clonic epileptic seizures during treatment with sedoanalgesia. The patient was intubated with 2 mg midazolam, 200 mg propofol and 50 mg rocuronium intravenously, while oxygen was provided by mask at 6 liters / min. Anesthesia was maintained with 4 lt / min 50% oxygen and 50% air mixture and 2% sevoflurane. There were signs of respiratory acidosis in the blood gas analysis. She was intubated for half an hour by a mechanical ventilator. The operation was canceled. In blood gas monitoring the values were within normal limits. Sugammadex was applied by the gynecology and obstetrics department. In all cases where local anesthetic is planned, necessary precautions should be taken to cope with rare complications

Evaluation of sciatic nerve damage following intraneural injection of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and lidocaine in rats / Avaliação da lesão do nervo ciático após injeção intraneural de bupivacaína, levobupivacaína e lidocaína em ratos

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: The local anesthetics may cause neurotoxicity. We aimed to compare the neurotoxic potential of different local anesthetics, local anesthetic induced nerve damage and pathological changes of a peripheral nerve. METHODS: Sixty Wistar rats weighing 200-350 g were studied. Rats were assigned into 3 groups and 26-gauge needle was inserted under magnification into the left sciatic nerve and 0.2 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine, 5% levobupivacaine, and 2% lidocaine were injected intraneurally. An individual who was blind to the specifics of the injection monitored the neurologic function on postoperative 1st day, and daily thereafter. Neurologic examination included assessment for the presence and severity of nociception and grasping reflexes. At the 7th day sciatic nerve specimen was taken for evaluation of histopathologic changes. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference detected among groups regarding grasping reflex and histopathologic evaluation. Two cases in bupivacaine group, 1 case in levobupivacaine group and 2 cases in lidocaine group had slight grasping, while 1 case in lidocaine group had no grasping reflex on the seventh day. Severe axonal degeneration was observed in all groups, respectively in bupivacaine group 4 (20%), levobupivacaine group 3 (15%), and lidocaine group 6 (30%). CONCLUSION: In all groups, histopathological damage frequency and severity were more than the motor deficiency.

RESUMO OBJETIVO: Os anestésicos locais podem causar neurotoxicidade. Nosso objetivo foi comparar o potencial neurotóxico de diferentes anestésicos locais, os danos induzidos aos nervos e as alterações patológicas de um nervo periférico. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 60 ratos Whistler com 200-350 g. Os ratos foram divididos em três grupos, uma agulha de calibre 26 foi inserida no nervo ciático esquerdo, com o uso de ampliação, e 0,2 mL de bupivacaína a 0,5%, levobupivacaína a 5% e lidocaína a 2% foram injetados por via intraneural. Um colaborador, cego para os conteúdos das injeções, monitorou a função neurológica no primeiro dia de pós-operatório e depois diariamente. O exame neurológico incluiu a avaliação da presença e da gravidade da nocicepção e dos reflexos de agarrar. No sétimo dia, uma amostra do nervo ciático foi colhida para avaliar as alterações histopatológicas. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença estatística entre os grupos em relação ao reflexo de agarrar e à avaliação histopatológica. Dois casos no grupo bupivacaína, um no grupo levobupivacaína e dois no grupo lidocaína apresentaram um leve reflexo de agarrar; também no grupo lidocaína, um caso não apresentou reflexo de agarrar no sétimo dia. Degeneração axonal grave foi observada em todos os grupos: quatro casos no grupo bupivacaína (20%), três no grupo levobupivacaína 3 (15%) e seis no grupo lidocaína (30%). CONCLUSÃO: Em todos os grupos, a frequência de dano histopatológico e de gravidade foi maior do que a deficiência motora.

A randomized, double blind comparison of pethidine and ketoprofen as adjuvants for lignocaine in intravenous regional anaesthesia / Estudo comparativo, randômico e duplo-cego de petidina e cetoprofeno como adjuvantes de lidocaína em anestesia regional intravenosa / Estudio comparativo, aleatorizado y doble ciego, de la petidina y del ketoprofeno como adyuvantes de la lidocaína en la anestesia regional intravenosa

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A review of all the adjuncts for intravenous regional anaesthesia concluded that there is good evidence to recommend NonSteroidal Anti-Inflammatory agents and pethidine in the dose of 30 mg dose as adjuncts to intravenous regional anaesthesia. But there are no studies to compare pethidine of 30 mg dose to any of the NonSteroidal Anti-Inflammatory agents. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double blind study, 45 patients were given intravenous regional anaesthesia with either lignocaine alone or lignocaine with pethidine 30 mg or lignocaine with ketprofen 100 mg. Fentanyl was used as rescue analgesic during surgery. For the first 6 h of postoperative period analgesia was provided by fentanyl injection and between 6 and 24 h analgesia was provided by diclofenac tablets. Visual analogue scores for pain and consumption of fentanyl and diclofenac were compared. RESULTS: The block was inadequate for one case each in lignocaine group and pethidine group, so general anaesthesia was provided. Time for the first dose of fentanyl required for postoperative analgesia was significantly more in pethidine and ketoprofen groups compared to lignocaine group (156.7 ± 148.8 and 153.0 ± 106.0 vs. 52.1 ± 52.4 min respectively). Total fentanyl consumption in first 6 h of postoperative period was less in pethidine and ketoprofen groups compared to lignocaine group (37.5 ± 29.0 mcg, 38.3 ± 20.8 mcg vs. 64.2 ± 27.2 mcg respectively). Consumption of diclofenac tablets was 2.4 ± 0.7, 2.5 ± 0.5 and 2.0 ± 0.7 in the control, pethidine and ketoprofen group respectively, which was statistically not significant. Side effects were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Both pethidine and ketoprofen are equally effective in providing postoperative analgesia up to 6 h, without significant difference in the side effects and none of the adjuncts provide significant ...

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: uma revisão de todos os adjuvantes para anestesia regional intravenosa concluiu que há boas evidências para recomendar os agentes anti-inflamatórios não esteroides e petidina em dose de 30 mg como adjuvantes para anestesia regional intravenosa. Porém, não há estudos que comparem petidina (30 mg) com quaisquer dos agentes anti-inflamatórios não esteroides. MÉTODOS: em um estudo prospectivo, randômico e duplo-cego, 45 pacientes receberam anestesia regional intravenosa com apenas lidocaína ou lidocaína com petidina (30 mg) ou lidocaína com cetoprofeno (100 mg). Fentanil foi usado como analgésico de resgate durante a cirurgia. Durante as seis primeiras horas de pós-operatório, analgesia foi fornecida via injeção de fentanil e, entre seis e 24 horas, analgesia foi fornecida via comprimidos de diclofenaco. Os escores visuais analógicos para dor e do consumo de fentanil e diclofenaco foram comparados. RESULTADOS: o bloqueio foi inadequado para um caso tanto do grupo lidocaína quanto do grupo petidina; portanto, anestesia geral foi administrada. O tempo para a primeira dose necessária de fentanil para analgesia pós-operatória foi significativamente maior nos grupos petidina e cetoprofeno em comparação com o grupo lidocaína (156,7 ± 148,8 e 153,0 ± 106,0 vs. 52,1 ± 52,4 minutos, respectivamente). O consumo total de fentanil nas primeiras seis horas de pós-operatório foi menor nos grupos petidina e cetoprofeno em comparação com o grupo lidocaína (37,5 ± 29,0 mcg, 38,3 ± 20,8 mcg vs. 64,2 ± 27,2 mcg, respectivamente). O consumo de comprimidos de diclofenaco foi de 2,4 ± 0,7, 2,5 ± 0,5 e 2,0 ± 0,7 no grupo controle, petidina e cetoprofeno, respectivamente, o que não foi estatisticamente significante. ...

JUSTIFICACIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: una revisión sobre todos los adyuvantes para la anestesia regional intravenosa concluyó que hay buenas evidencias para recomendar los agentes antiinflamatorios no esteroideos y la petidina en dosis de 30 mg como adyuvantes para la anestesia regional intravenosa. Sin embargo, no hay estudios comparando la petidina (30 mg) con cualesquiera de los agentes antiinflamatorios no-esteroideos. MÉTODOS: en un estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado y doble ciego, 45 pacientes recibieron anestesia regional intravenosa con solamente lidocaína o lidocaína con petidina (30 mg) o lidocaína con ketoprofeno (100 mg). El fentanilo fue usado como analgésico de rescate durante la cirugía. Durante las 6 primeras horas del postoperatorio, la analgesia fue suministrada vía inyección de fentanilo y entre 6 y 24 h, la analgesia fue suministrada vía comprimidos de diclofenaco. Se compararon las puntuaciones visuales analógicas para el dolor y el consumo de fentanilo y diclofenaco. RESULTADOS: el bloqueo fue inadecuado para un caso tanto del grupo lidocaína como del grupo petidina; por tanto, se administró anestesia general. El tiempo para la primera dosis necesaria de fentanilo para analgesia postoperatoria fue significativamente mayor en los grupos petidina y ketoprofeno en comparación con el grupo lidocaína (156,7 ± 148,8 y 153,0 ± 106,0 vs. 52,1 ± 52,4 min, respectivamente). El consumo total de fentanilo en las primeras 6 h del postoperatorio fue menor en los grupos petidina y ketoprofeno en comparación con el grupo lidocaína (37,5 ± 29,0 mcg; 38,3 ± 20,8 mcg vs. 64,2 ± 27,2 mcg, respectivamente). El consumo de comprimidos de diclofenaco fue de 2,4 ± 0,7; 2,5 ± 0,5; y 2 ± 0,7 en el grupo control, petidina y ketoprofeno, respectivamente, lo que no fue estadísticamente significativo. Los ...

Addition of lidocaine to levobupivacaine reduces intrathecal block duration: randomized controlled trial / Adição de lidocaína à levobupivacaína reduz a duração do bloqueio intratecal: estudo clínico randômico / La adición de lidocaína a la levobupivacaína reduce la duración del bloqueo intratecal: estudio clínico aleatorizado

Background: The duration of the spinal block is a concern for anesthetists. Low dose intrathecal lidocaine has vasodilatory effects and increases the local anesthetic clearance from the intrathecal space. The aim was to investigate whether this effect of lidocaine can be used to increase the resolution of levobupivacaine spinal anesthesia. Method: After obtaining ethical approval and informed patient consent, 40 patients underwent transurethral prostate resection were studied. Patients were randomized into two groups and patients received either levobupivacaine 6.75 mg + 0.3 mL 2% lidocaine (Group L) or levobupivacaine 6.75 mg + saline (Group C). The main outcome measures were the difference between groups regarding the duration of the spinal block and PACU stay. Secondary outcome measures were the difference between groups in onset and resolution of the spinal block, adverse events and treatments were also investigated. Results: Spinal block resolved faster in Group L than Group C; 162.43 ± 39.4 min vs 219.73 ± 37.3 min (p = 0.000). PACU time was shorter in Group L (109 ± 49.9 min in Group L vs 148 ± 56.8 min in Group C) (p = 0.036). There was no difference between groups with respect to the incidence of adverse events and treatments. Groups were also similar regarding complications. PDPH and TNS were not observed in any group. Conclusion: Addition of low dose lidocaine to hyperbaric levobupivacaine reduces the duration of the intrathecal block provided by hyperbaric levobupivacaine. This technique can be used to reduce the spinal block duration for relatively short procedures like TUR-P. .

Justificativa e objetivo: a duração do bloqueio espinhal é uma preocupação para os anestesistas. Lidocaína intratecal em dose baixa tem efeito vasodilatador e aumenta a eliminação do anestésico local do espaço intratecal. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar se esse efeito da lidocaína pode ser usado para aumentar a resolução da anestesia espinhal com levobupivacaína. Método: após obter aprovação do Comitê de Ética e consentimento informado, 40 pacientes submetidos à ressecção transuretral da próstata foram incluídos no estudo. Os pacientes foram randomizados em dois grupos e receberam6mgde levobupivacaína + 0,3 mL de lidocaína a 2% (Grupo L) ou6,75mgde levobupivacaína + solução salina (Grupo C). O desfecho primário foi a diferença entre os grupos em relação à duração do bloqueio espinhal e a permanência na sala de recuperação pós-anestésica (SRPA). Os desfechos secundários foram a diferença entre os grupos em relação ao início e à resolução do bloqueio espinhal; eventos adversos e tratamentos também foram investigados. Resultados: a resolução do bloqueio espinhal foi mais rápida no Grupo L do que no Grupo C: 162,43 ± 39,4 min vs. 219 ± 37,3 min (p = 0,000). O tempo na SRPA foi menor no Grupo L do que no Grupo C: 109 ± 49,9 min vs. 148 ± 56,8 min (p = 0,036). Não houve diferença entre os grupos em relação à incidência de eventos adversos e tratamentos. Os grupos também foram semelhantes no que diz respeito a complicações. Cefaleia pós-punção dural (CPPD) e sintomas neurológicos transitórios (SNT) não foram observados em nenhum grupo. Conclusão: a adição ...

Justificación y objetivo: la duración del bloqueo raquídeo es una preocupación para los anestesistas. La lidocaína intratecal en dosis baja tiene un efecto vasodilatador y aumenta la eliminación del anestésico local del espacio intratecal. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar si ese efecto de la lidocaína puede ser usado para aumentar la resolución de la anestesia raquídea con levobupivacaína. Método: después de obtener la aprobación del Comité de Ética y el consentimiento informado del paciente, fueron incluidos en el estudio 40 pacientes sometidos a resección transuretral de próstata. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados en 2 grupos y recibieron 6 mg de levobupivacaína + 0,3 mL de lidocaína al 2% (grupo L) o 6,75 mg de levobupivacaína + solución salina (grupo C). El objetivo primario fue analizar la diferencia entre los grupos con relación a la duración del bloqueo raquídeo y la permanencia en la sala de reanimación postanestesia. El secundario fue la diferencia entre los grupos con relación al inicio y al término del bloqueo raquídeo. También se investigaron los eventos adversos y los tratamientos. Resultados: la resolución del bloqueo raquídeo fue más rápida en el grupo L que en el grupo C (162,43 ± 39,4 min vs. 219,73 ± 37,3 min [p = 0,000]). El tiempo en la sala de reanimación postanestesia fue menor en el grupo L que en el grupo C (109 ± 49,9 min vs. 148 ± 56,8 min [p = 0,036]). No hubo diferencia entre los grupos con relación a la incidencia de eventos adversos y tratamientos. Los grupos también fueron similares en lo que respecta a las complicaciones. No se observó en ningún grupo ni cefalea pospunción dural ni síntomas neurológicos transitorios. Conclusión: la adición de una ...

Anestesia local por tumescência com lidocaína em cadelas submetidas a mastectomia / Tumescent local anesthesia with lidocaine in dogs undergoing mastectomy

O presente estudo investigou os benefícios da anestesia por tumescência com lidocaína em cadelas submetidas à mastectomia, visando ao conforto do paciente e à sua recuperação pós-operatória. Foram utilizados sete animais, de peso e raças variadas, que apresentavam neoplasia em região de cadeia mamária e que foram submetidos à cirurgia de mastectomia. Todos os animais receberam o mesmo protocolo anestésico, sendo utilizado como MPA a associação entre acepromazina e morfina, nas doses de 0,04mg/kg e 0,4mg/kg (IM), respectivamente. Após 15 minutos, foi alocado um cateter em veia cefálica e realizou-se a indução com propofol 4mg/kg e midazolam 0,2mg/kg, seguida de manutenção anestésica com isofluorano. Posteriormente à instrumentação, procedeu-se à técnica de anestesia por tumescência com solução gelada composta por ringer lactato, lidocaína 2% sem vasoconstritor e adrenalina, em um volume total de 15mL/kg. Em média, o tempo de duração do procedimento foi de 74±18 minutos. O pico plasmático de lidocaína deu-se entre 30 e 60 minutos após a infiltração da solução. O resgate analgésico foi realizado após sete horas, aproximadamente, da infiltração. Pode-se concluir que a anestesia por tumescência com lidocaína deve ser considerada como constituinte do protocolo anestésico e analgésico de cadelas a serem submetidas à cirurgia de mastectomia, proporcionando estabilidade de parâmetros, segurança e recuperação pós-operatória de boa qualidade.

The present study investigated the benefits of tumescent anesthesia with lidocaine in dogs undergoing mastectomy, seeking the patients' comfort and their postoperative recovery. Seven animals, with different weight and breed, who had cancer in the region of mammary chain underwent mastectomy surgery. All animals received the same anesthetic protocol being used as the association between acepromazine and morphine doses of 0.04mg.kg-1 and 0.4mg.kg-1 (IM), respectively. After 15 minutes a catheter was placed in the cephalic vein and induction with propofol 4mg.kg-1 and 0.2mg.kg-1 followed by maintenance with isoflurane anesthesia was done. After instrumentation, we proceeded to the tumescent anesthesia technique with ice-cold solution consisting of Ringer's lactate, lidocaine 2% without epinephrine and adrenaline in a total volume of 15mL.kg-1. The average duration of the procedure was 74±18 minutes. The plasmatic peak of lidocaine was between 30 and 60 minutes after infiltration. The rescue analgesic was performed after approximately seven hours of infiltration. It can be concluded that the tumescent anesthesia with lidocaine should be considered as a constituent of anesthetic and analgesic protocol in dogs undergoing mastectomy surgery providing parameter stability, safety and good quality postoperative recovery.

Myositis Ossificans of the Elbow after a Trigger Point Injection

Trigger point injection is a simple procedure that is widely performed for relieving pain. Even though there are several complications of trigger point injection, myositis ossificans has not been documented as one of its complications. We treated a patient who suffered from painful limitation of elbow motion and this was caused by myositis ossificans between the insertions of brachialis and supinator muscles after a trigger point injection containing lidocaine mixed with saline, and we also review the relevant medical literature.

Intravenous regional block is similar to sympathetic ganglion block for pain management in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I

Sympathetic ganglion block (SGB) or intravenous regional block (IVRB) has been recommended for pain management in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I). Forty-five patients were initially selected but only 43 were accepted for the study. The present study evaluated the efficacy of IVRB produced by combining 70 mg lidocaine with 30 µg clonidine (14 patients, 1 male/13 females, age range: 27-50 years) versus SGB produced by the injection of 70 mg lidocaine alone (14 patients, 1 male/13 females, age range: 27-54 years) or combined with 30 µg clonidine (15 patients, 1 male/14 females, age range: 25-50 years) into the stellate ganglion for pain management in patients with upper extremity CRPS-I. Each procedure was repeated five times at 7-day intervals, and pain intensity and duration were measured using a visual analog scale immediately before each procedure. A progressive and significant reduction in pain scores and a significant increase in the duration of analgesia were observed in all groups following the first three blocks, but no further improvement was obtained following the last two blocks. Drowsiness, the most frequent side effect, and dry mouth occurred only in patients submitted to SGB with lidocaine combined with clonidine. The three methods were similar regarding changes in pain intensity and duration of analgesia. However, IVRB seems to be preferable to SGB due to its easier execution and lower risk of undesirable effects.

Incidence of back pain following spinal anesthesia and its relationship to various factors in 176 patients

After neuraxial anesthesia, back pain is the most common complaint. The back pain may be related to needle trauma or surgical positioning or transient neurotoxicity of concentrated local anesthetics. The goal of this study was to compare the incidence of back pain following spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric lidocaine 5% and bupivacaine 0.5% and spinal needle insertion spaces. In this clinical trial after approving ethics committee and obtaining patients consent, we included 176 adult patients with physical status of I- II ASA from May 2006 to May 2008 undergoing various elective urologic surgeries under spinal anesthesia in Imam Hospital in Tabriz, Iran. Patients were allocated randomly in two equal groups. Group lidocaine, a nesthetized with hyperbaric 5% lidocaine and group bupivacaine. All patients were interviewed 6, 24, 48 hours after surgery for back pain. This study indicated no statistically significance difference in the incidence of back pain following spinal anesthesia considering age and frequency of needle puncture during spinal anesthesia. Incidence of back pain was higher in lidocaine group than bupivacaine group [31.82% vs. 18.18%; respectively; P<0.001].Incidence of back pain was higher in L3-4 interspace of needle insertion than L4-5 [23.7% vs. 12.8%, respectively; P<0.001]. The intensity of back pain was slight and tolerable in 77% of the cases, and the back pain in all the patients lasted not more than 48 hours. This study implies that the area of needle insertion and type of anesthetics have effects on the back pain following spinal anesthesia

Monitorização materno-fetal durante procedimento odontológico em portadora de cardiopatia valvar / Maternal-fetal monitoring during dental procedure in patients with heart valve disease / Monitoreo maternofetal durante procedimiento odontológico en portadora de cardiopatía valvular

FUNDAMENTO: Os efeitos da anestesia local em odontologia com lidocaína e epinefrina, sobre parâmetros cardiovasculares de gestantes portadoras de valvopatias e seus conceptos, não estão esclarecidos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar e analisar parâmetros da cardiotocografia, de pressão arterial e eletrocardiográficos da gestante portadora de doença valvar reumática, quando submetida à anestesia local com 1,8 ml de lidocaína 2 por cento sem vasoconstritor e com epinefrina 1:100.000, durante procedimento odontológico restaurador. MÉTODOS: Realizamos monitorização ambulatorial da pressão arterial, eletrocardiografia ambulatorial materna e cardiotocografia de 31 portadoras de cardiopatia reumática, entre a 28ª e 37ª semana de gestação, divididas em dois grupos conforme presença ou não do vasoconstritor RESULTADOS: Demonstrou-se redução significativa dos valores de frequência cardíaca materna nos dois grupos, durante o procedimento, quando comparado aos demais períodos (p < 0,001). Houve ocorrência de arritmia cardíaca em 9 (29,0 por cento) pacientes, das quais 7 (41,8 por cento) pertencentes ao grupo de 17 gestantes que recebeu anestesia com adrenalina. A pressão arterial materna não apresentou diferença quando comparamos períodos ou grupos (p > 0,05). O mesmo ocorreu (p > 0,05) com número de contrações uterinas, nível e variabilidade da linha de base e número de acelerações da frequência cardíaca fetal. CONCLUSÃO: O uso de 1,8 ml de lidocaína 2 por cento associado à adrenalina mostrou-se seguro e eficaz em procedimento odontológico restaurador durante a gestação de mulheres com cardiopatia valvar reumática.

BACKGROUND: The effects of local dental anesthesia with lidocaine and epinephrine on cardiovascular parameters of pregnant women with heart valve diseases and their fetuses are not fully understood. OBJECTIVES: To assess and analyze cardiotocographic, blood pressure and electrocardiographic parameters of pregnant women with rheumatic heart valve disease undergoing local anesthesia with 1.8mL of lidocaine 2 percent with or without epinephrine 1:100,000 during restorative dental treatment. METHODS: Maternal ambulatory blood pressure and electrocardiographic monitoring as well as cardiotocography of 31 patients with rheumatic heart disease were performed between the 28th and 37th week of gestation. The patients were divided into two groups, those with or without vasoconstrictor. RESULTS: A significant reduction in maternal heart rate was shown in both groups during the procedure in comparison with the other periods (p<0.001). Cardiac arrhythmia was observed in nine (29.0 percent) patients, of which seven (41.8 percent) were from the group of 17 pregnant women who received anesthesia plus epinephrine. No difference in maternal blood pressure was observed when periods or groups were compared (p>0.05). The same occurred (p>0.05) with the number of uterine contractions, baseline level and variability, and number of accelerations of fetal heart rate. CONCLUSION: The use of 1.8mL of lidocaine 2 percent in combination with epinephrine was safe and efficient in restorative dental procedures during pregnancy in women with rheumatic heart valve disease.

FUNDAMENTO: Los efectos de la anestesia local en odontología con lidocaína y epinefrina, sobre los parámetros cardiovasculares de gestantes portadoras de valvulopatías y sus conceptos, no son claros. OBJETIVO: Evaluar y analizar parámetros de la cardiotocografía, de la presión arterial y electrocardiográficos de la gestante portadora de enfermedad valvular reumática, al someterse a anestesia local con 1,8 ml de lidocaína 2 por ciento sin vasoconstrictor y con epinefrina 1:100.000, durante procedimiento odontológico restaurador. MÉTODOS: Realizamos monitoreo ambulatorio de la presión arterial, electrocardiografía ambulatoria materna y cardiotocografía de 31 portadoras de cardiopatía reumática, entre la 28ª y la 37ª semana de gestación, divididas en dos grupos según la presencia o no del vasoconstrictor. RESULTADOS: Se observó reducción significativa de los valores de frecuencia cardíaca materna en los dos grupos, durante el procedimiento, al compararlo con los demás períodos (p < 0,001). Se registró ocurrencia de arritmia cardíaca en 9 (29,0 por ciento) pacientes, de las cuales 7 (41,8 por ciento) pertenecían al grupo de 17 gestantes que recibió anestesia con adrenalina. La presión arterial materna no presentó diferencia al comparar períodos o grupos (p > 0,05). Lo mismo ocurrió (p > 0,05) con el número de contracciones uterinas, nivel de variabilidad de la línea de base y número de aceleraciones de la frecuencia cardíaca fetal. CONCLUSIÓN: El uso de 1,8 ml de lidocaína 2 por ciento asociado a la adrenalina se mostró seguro y eficaz en procedimiento odontológico restaurador durante la gestación de mujeres con cardiopatía valvular reumática.

Study of efficacy and safety of a new local cream ("healer") in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, comparative study / Estudo da eficácia e segurança de novo creme cicatrizante para o tratamento da fissura anal crônica: estudo prospectivo, randomizado, simples-cego e comparativo

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of "healer" cream as monotherapy in the treatment of acute and chronic anal fissure. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, single blinded, comparative trial. METHODS: Sixty patients suffering from anal fissure were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into three groups: group A: treated with "healer" local cream application 3 times daily; group B: treated with nitroglycerine 0.25 percent local cream 3 times daily; group C: treated with a lidocaine 2 percent cream applied locally 3 times daily. All the followings were followed up and compared between groups. (1) Visual pain analogue score after defecation; (2) severity of straining and discomfort during defecation; (3) frequency of ulcer healed at 30 days; (4) any side effects or complications. RESULTS: The pain scoring after defecation was significantly reduced in the three treatment groups. The group treated with "healer" isosorbide-di-nitrate showed the greatest reduction of the visual pain analogue score median from 9 before treatment to 3 & 1 after 10 and 20 days respectively, while the median visual pain analogue score in group B treated with nitroglycerine cream was 9 reduced to 4 & 2 after 10 and 20 days respectively, and the median visual pain analogue score in lidocaine group only dropped from 9 to 6 and 4, respectively. The reduction of both pain scoring and defecation scoring with "healer" was statistically significantly greater than the other two treatments by Kruskal-Wallis test, P<0.001. The number of patients experiencing complete relief and passing stools easily after 10 days was significantly higher in "healer" group, by Pearson Chi square = 22.94, P<0.001. After 30 days, the fissures were healed in 18 (90 percent) of 20 patients in the "healer" group and in 12 (60 percent) of 20 in the nitroglycerin group, while only 6 (30 percent) of patients treated with lidocaine cream had their fissures healed by ...

OBJETIVOS: Determinar a eficácia e segurança de "creme cicatrizante" (dinitrato de isosorbida 1 por cento; lidocaína 2 por cento; rutosídios 5 por cento em base de creme anti-séptico) como monoterapia no tratamento da fissura anal aguda ou crônica. METODOLOGIA: Estudo prospectivo, randomizado, simples-cego, comparativo. Foram incluídos 60 pacientes com fissura anal. Foram divididos randomicamente em três grupos: grupo A: tratados com "creme cicatrizante", grupo B: tratados com creme de nitroglicerina 0,25 por cento e grupo C: tratados com creme de lidocaína 2 por cento aplicado. Em todos foi feita aplicação local 3 vezes ao dia. Os seguintes parâmetros foram aferidos: 1) escore analógico visual de dor após defecação, 2) severidade de esforço e desconforto para evacuar, 3) frequência da cicatrização após 30 dias, 4) presença de efeitos colaterais ou complicações. RESULTADOS: O escore de dor após a defecação foi reduzido significativamente nos três grupos. O grupo tratado com creme cicatrizante mostrou grande redução do escore médio de 9 para 3 e 1 após 10 e 20 dias de tratamento, respectivamente, enquanto que a média do grupo B foi reduzida de 9 para 4 e 2 e do grupo C de 9 para 6 e 4 após 10 e 20 dias de tratamento, respectivamente. A redução tanto da dor como do desconforto evacuatório com o uso de "creme cicatrizante" foi significativo em comparação com os outros cremes pelo teste de Kruskal-Wallis, P<0,001. O número de pacientes que referiram alívio completo e passagem fácil da fezes após 10 dias de tratamento foi maior e significativo no grupo A pelo teste Pearson, P<0,001. Após 30 dias, as fissuras estavam cicatrizadas em 18 (90 por cento) pacientes do grupo A, em 12 (60 por cento) do grupo B e em apenas 6 (30 por cento) do grupo C. Qui ao quadrado = 15 (P = 0,001). CONCLUSÃO: O "creme cicatrizante" é um tratamento que promete ser promissor e seguro na fissura anal aguda ou crônica. A característica farmacocinética do creme leva ...

Locoregional anesthesia for dental treatment in cardiac patients: a comparative study of 2 percent plain lidocaine and 2 percent lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100, 000)

OBJECTIVES: This study analyzes hemodynamic changes in patients with cardiac valvular diseases submitted to dental treatment under local anesthesia containing epinephrine. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was performed at the Dental Division of the Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (Brazil). Patients were separated into two groups with the help of an aleatory number table: 2 percent plain lidocaine (PL, n= 31) and 2 percent lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) (LE, n= 28). Blood pressure, heart rate, oxygenation and electrocardiogram data were all recorded throughout the procedure. State and trait anxiety levels were measured. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were selected for the LE group (n=28), with an average age of 40.3 ± 10.9, or for the PL group (n=31), age 42.2 ± 10.3. No differences were shown in blood pressure, heart rate and pulse oximetry values before, during and after local anesthesia injection between the two groups. State and trait anxiety levels were not different. Arrhythmias observed before dental anesthesia did not change in shape or magnitude after treatment. Complaints of pain during the dental procedure were more frequent within the PL group, which received a higher amount of local anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) provided effective local anesthesia. This treatment did not cause an increase in heart rate or blood pressure and did not cause any arrhythmic changes in patients with cardiac valvular diseases.

Preemptive effects of Lidocain on postoperative pain in patients undergoing disc operation: a Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial

Postoperative pain is a major poorly managed problem in millions of operations performed all over the world each year. Since infiltration of the operative field with lidocain as a local anesthetic is very cheap, it is easily available, and there are few side effects, this study aimed to evaluate its efficacy on post-op-pain of patients undergoing open intervertebral disc surgery. In this double blind clinical trial on 188 patients undergoing elective open intervertebral disc operation, the surgical incision site was infiltrated with 2 ml of 1/500,000 epinephrine for each centimeter in the control group and the same solution with 20 mg lidocain for each centimeter of the incision in the case group. Post-oppain was measured with visual analog scale [VAS] in the 6[th], 12[th], 24[th], and 48[th] hours. The mean age was 41.8 +/- 12.4 for the study group, and 43.5 +/- 15.6 for the control one. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in pain severity in females, but for males it was significant at the 6th and 24th hours. Interestingly, it was more severe in those receiving lidocain. The amount of narcotics used postoperatively revealed no significant difference in the groups. Lidocain used locally before skin incision has no effect on reducing post-op-pain, post-op-narcotics demand, and duration of hospital stay

Efeitos da metadona ou do neostigmine, associados à lidocaína administrados pela via epidural em cães / Effects of methadone or neostigmine in combination with lidocaine for epidural anesthesia in dogs

Seis cães adultos, de raças e sexos variados, com peso de 13,3±3,4kg (média±DP), foram utilizados no estudo. Os animais foram tranqüilizados com acepromazina (0,1mg/kg, IV) e, após 30 minutos, foram aleatoriamente submetidos à anestesia epidural com um dos seguintes tratamentos: lidocaína 2 por cento 0,25ml/kg (controle); neostigmine 0,01mg/kg+lidocaína (NEO); metadona 0,3mg/kg+lidocaína (MET). Todos os animais foram submetidos aos três tratamentos com intervalo mínimo de uma semana. Foram mensuradas as freqüências cardíaca (FC) e respiratória (FR), a pressão arterial sistólica (PAS), o tempo para a perda do reflexo interdigital, a duração e a altura do bloqueio sensitivo, durante um período de 90 minutos. Não houve diferença significativa entre os tratamentos nos valores de FC, PAS e FR, bem como na duração do bloqueio sensitivo e no tempo para a perda do reflexo interdigital. No grupo MET, houve diminuição de FC dos 30 aos 90 minutos em relação ao valor basal. Bloqueio sensitivo mais cranial também foi observado em MET. A associação de neostigmine ou metadona não prolongou o período hábil de anestesia epidural produzido pela lidocaína em cães. A metadona, mas não o neostigmine, parece estender mais cranialmente o bloqueio epidural pela lidocaína.

Six mature mongrel dogs of both genders, weighing 13.3±3.4kg (mean±SD) were used in the present research. Thirty minutes after premedication with intravenous acepromazine (0.1mg/kg, IV), dogs were randomly assigned to receive epidural administration of one of following three treatments: 2 percent lidocaine 0.25ml/kg (control), or neostigmine 0.01mg/kg plus lidocaine (NEO), or methadone 0.3mg/kg plus lidocaine (MET). All dogs received all treatments in a cross-over design with at least one-week interval. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), time to loss of pedal withdrawal reflex, duration of epidural anesthesia, and cranial spread of epidural anesthesia were evaluated for 90 minutes. No differences among treatments in HR, RR, SAP, duration of anesthesia, and time to loss of pedal withdrawal reflex were found. In MET, HR decreased from 30 to 90 minutes compared to baseline and there was a higher cranial spread of epidural anesthesia than in controls and NEO animals. Neostigmine or methadone did not prolong epidural anesthesia with lidocaine in dogs. Methadone, but not neostigmine, appeared to result in more cranial spread of epidural anesthesia with lidocaine.

Efeito de anestésicos locais com e sem vasoconstritor em pacientes com arritmias ventriculares / Effect of local anesthetics with and without vasoconstrictor agent in patients with ventricular arrhythmias

FUNDAMENTO: A utilização de anestésicos locais associados a vasoconstritores para tratamento odontológico de rotina de pacientes cardiopatas ainda gera controvérsia, em razão do risco de efeitos cardiovasculares adversos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar e comparar os efeitos hemodinâmicos do uso de anestésico local com vasoconstritor não-adrenérgico em pacientes portadores de arritmias ventriculares, em relação ao uso de anestésico sem vasoconstritor. MÉTODOS: Um estudo prospectivo randomizado avaliou 33 pacientes com sorologia positiva para doença de Chagas' e 32 pacientes com doença arterial coronariana, portadores de arritmia ventricular complexa ao Holter (>10 EV/h e TVNS), 21 do sexo feminino, idade de 54,73 + 7,94 anos, submetidos a tratamento odontológico de rotina com anestesia pterigomandibular. Esses pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos: no grupo I, utilizou-se prilocaína a 3 por cento associada a felipressina 0,03 UI/ml, e no grupo II, lidocaína a 2 por cento sem vasoconstritor. Avaliaram-se o número e a complexidade de extra-sístoles, a freqüência cardíaca e a pressão arterial sistêmica dos pacientes no dia anterior, uma hora antes, durante o procedimento odontológico e uma hora após. RESULTADOS: Não foram observadas alterações hemodinâmicas, nem aumento do número e da complexidade da arritmia ventricular, relacionados ao anestésico utilizado, em ambos os grupos. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados sugerem que prilocaína a 3 por cento associada a felipressina 0,03 UI/ml pode ser utilizada com segurança em pacientes chagásicos e coronarianos, com arritmia ventricular complexa.

BACKGROUND: The routine use of local anesthetics associated to vasoconstrictors for the dental treatment of patients with cardiopathies is still controversial, due to the risk of adverse cardiovascular effects. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the hemodynamic effects of the use of local anesthetics with a non-adrenergic vasoconstrictor in patients with ventricular arrhythmia, when compared to the use of anesthetics without vasoconstrictor. METHODS: A prospective randomized study evaluated 33 patients with positive serology for Chagas' disease and 32 patients with coronary artery disease that presented complex ventricular arrhythmia at Holter monitoring (>10 EV/h and NSVT), of which 21 were females, aged 54.73 + 7.94 years, submitted to routine dental treatment with pterygomandibular anesthesia. These patients were divided in two groups: group I received prilocaine 3 percent associated with felypressin 0.03 IU/ml and group II received lidocaine 2 percent without vasoconstrictor. The number and complexity of extrasystoles were analyzed, as well as the heart rate and systemic arterial pressure of the patients on the day before, one hour before, during the procedure and one hour after the dental procedure. RESULTS: No hemodynamic alterations or increase in the number and complexity of the ventricular arrhythmia related to the anesthetic used in the dental procedure were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that prilocaine 3 percent associated to a felypressin 0.03 IU/ml can be safely used in patients with Chagas' disease or coronariopathy with complex ventricular arrhythmia.

Anestesia epidural com lidocaína isolada e associada ao fentanil para realização de ováriossalpingo-histerectomia em cadelas / Epidural anesthesia with lidocaine and its combination with fentanyl for ovaryhysterectomy in dogs

Investigou-se o efeito da lidocaína isolada ou associada ao fentanil na anestesia epidural, para realização de ováriossalpingo-histerectomia. Dezoito cadelas foram tranqüilizadas com acepromazina, seguindo-se indução anestésica com propofol, para a realização da punção lombossacra. Os animais foram distribuídos em dois grupos: o grupo GL recebeu lidocaína (8,5mg/kg) e o GLF fentanil (5µg/kg) associado à lidocaína (6,5mg/kg). Mensuraram-se as freqüências cardíaca (FC) e respiratória (FR), pressão arterial sistólica (PAS), variáveis hemogasométricas, concentração sérica de cortisol, necessidade de complementação anestésica com propofol durante a cirurgia, temperatura retal (T), período de latência e duração do bloqueio anestésico. Foi observada redução na FC, FR e PAS no GL e GLF, porém esses parâmetros mantiveram-se dentro dos limites fisiológicos. Para ambos os grupos, a concentração sérica de cortisol manteve-se estável após a cirurgia. Complementação anestésica foi necessária em 40 por cento e 75 por cento dos animais do GLF e GL, respectivamente. Conclui-se que ambos os protocolos foram suficientes para inibir a elevação sérica do cortisol, e resultaram em alterações mínimas cardiorrespiratórias, e que a complementação anestésica foi necessária.

The effects of lidocaine or lidocaine associated with fentanyl for epidural anesthesia in dogs were studied. Eighteen adult healthy bitches were sedated with acepromazine, with subsequent propofol anesthetic induction for the accomplishment of lumbosacral puncture. The animals were alloted in two groups and received: 8.5mg/kg lidocaine (GL group) or 5µg/kg fentanyl associated with 6.5mg/kg (GLF group). Heart and respiratory rates, systolic arterial blood pressure, blood gas variables, plasmatic concentration of cortisol, need of complementary doses of propofol for surgery, rectal temperature, and onset and duration of anesthesic block were measured. Mild alterations in the cardiorespiratory, blood gas variables and plasmatic concentration of cortisol were observed after the epidural anesthesia in both groups. There was no statistical significance in the onset and duration of anesthesic block. Complementary doses of propofol were necessary in 40 percent and 75 percent of the dogs in GLF and GL, respectively. The anesthesic protocols inhibited the elevation of the plasmatic concentration of cortisol, causing minimal cardiopulmonary alterations in the animals. Besides, the addition of fentanyl showed best results compared to the local anesthesic isolatedly.

The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI study) of ambulatory anesthesia: II. Anesthetic profiles and adverse events.

BACKGROUND: There is a continuing trend to have more elective surgery performed on an outpatient basis. OBJECTIVE: To determine anesthetic profiles and adverse events in practice of ambulatory anesthesia for elective surgery in different levels of hospitals across Thailand. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective descriptive study was conducted in 20 hospitals comprising seven university, five regional four general and four district hospitals across Thailand. Consecutive patients undergoing anesthesia for elective surgery were included. The included patients, classified as outpatients, were selected and extracted for summary of the result by using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The authors reported 7786 outpatients receiving anesthesia for elective surgery. The majority of patients were in ASA class 1 and 2 (96.2%) while the rest were in ASA class 3 (3.8%). Nearly 90% of the ASA class 3 patients were in university hospitals. The majority of patients (83.1%) did not receive premedication. Diazepam was used more frequently (11.5% vs. 0.1%) than other drugs. Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring and pulse oximetry were used in greater than 90%, while electrocardiogram (EKG) was used in 67.2% and end tidal CO2 in only 6.8%. The three most common anesthetic techniques were general anesthesia (including inhalation anesthetics), total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), and monitored anesthesia care (MAC). Regional anesthesia was performed in 12% of cases. The three most common regional anesthetic techniques were brachial plexus block (7.1%), spinal anesthesia (2.21%), and other peripheral nerve blocks (2.06%). Propofol was the most common drug for induction. Succinylcholine was used for intubation in 8.8%. The three most common nondepolaring neuromuscular blocking agents were atracurium, cisatracurium, and vecuronium. Fentanyl was the most common drug used among opioids. The three most common volatile anesthetics were sevoflurane, halothane, and isolurane. Lidocaine was the most frequently used in 29.76% of cases, while bupivacaine in 7.9% and ropivacaine only in 0.05%. The majority of the events relating to respiratory system were hypoxia or oxygen desaturation (18:10,000), reintubation (2.6:10,000) and difficult intubation (2.6:10,000), pulmonary aspiration (2.6:10,000), and esophageal intubation (1.3:10,000). Other adverse events included awareness (1.3:10,000), suspected myocardial infarction or ischemia (1.3:10,000), and drug error (1.3:10,000). Five patients (0.06%) received unplanned hospital admission. No patients developed cardiac arrest or died. CONCLUSION: The incidence of major adverse events was low in ambulatory anesthesia for elective surgery when compared to the incidence in general surgical population. The majority of the events occurred in the respiratory system. The authors did not find any complications relating to regional anesthesia. Despite a low incidence of adverse events in ambulatory anesthesia, anesthesia personnel who are responsible for ambulatory anesthesia should have adequate knowledge and skills in selection and preparation of the patients. Therefore, a system of preanesthesia evaluation is very important.